http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100518/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_apple_iphone_lovers

http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/alum-event-details.xml?eid=2453

View in PDF Version
For embedded components of tech-products, the lore of the ‘Intel Inside’ ingredient branding is a ‘siren’s song’ promising strong consumer identification and untold sales.  Like most stories of easy money and innovation in marketing, there is much more to tell.  While Intel has achieved ‘brand nirvana,’ the initial capital outlay for the ingredient marketing co-op easily measured in billions of dollars.  The advertising co-op that paid for a portion of computer manufacturers ads was heavily supplemented with television advertising, further increasing the cost beyond most marketing budgets.

A similar ingredient branding co-op is unlikely in today’s computing or mobile marketplace for a reason other than the marketing budget requirements, the commoditization effect it has on the entire consumer product.  Computer manufacturers learned the hard-way that the intense branding of the processor severely reduced the distinction of their product to the market — it is unlikely that another advertising co-op would be accepted with this outcome as precedent.

INVISIBLE BRAND

Even if your brand is invisible to its end-user, their input is vital to ensuring your product is the ‘secret ingredient’ in their favorite products.  Know your customers’ customers as well or better than they do.  For the ingredient brand, segmenting the end-user market is the most critical step in a good go-to-market strategy. 

Even if your brand is invisible to its end-user, their input is vital to ensuring your product is the ‘secret ingredient’ in their favorite products.

Segmenting is storytelling where the characters are the archetypal customers, high-quality images that speak to a broader reality.  Key to defining the characters in the narrative of segmenting is that they spreads word-of-mouth referencing within the group.  Successful customer-centric businesses like Best Buy push segmentation characterization down to the sales floor, training all associates to recognize different customers by their service needs, product associations, and sales conversions.  For the embedded technology marketer, end-user segments should initially be divided along their acceptance of technological innovation as either innovators, early adopters, early or late majority, or laggards.

WHERE A CHIP IS NOT JUST A CHIP…

Most embedded technology companies have a diverse portfolio of products thanks to the technology treadmill of the product life-cycle and the increasing availability design or end-of-line circuitry changes to a volume part.  While operationally minor, these additional products can be in vastly different consumer applications, targeting a different self-referencing segment. 

Following the bell-curve, the median adopter of technology also represents the largest market segment while those who tech-up with each new product are in a smaller, although more vocal self-referencing group.  Looking at the characterization of each of these segments can help in properly positioning each product in your portfolio to the most appropriate end user.

•             Innovators – “The Techie”

-              Guru endorsement & Tech Press Coverage

-              Demos/Trials

-              Open-Source Access

•             Early Adopters – “Key is Customer Service”

-              Whole Product

-              Positive Product Reviews

-              Positive Benchmarks

•             Early Majority – “Big Fish Consumers”

-              Market Share

-              Primary Product Placement

-              Vertical Press Coverage

•             Late Majority – “Your Mom”

-              Company Recognition

-              Full Product Line

-              Strategic Business Partners

Due to their own innovative and contagious energy toward a product, innovators and early adopters can act as de facto product marketers capable of sidelining product adoption by the majority market.  It is easier to market to people like us — techie’s who get it.  Far harder is targeting the majority market that wants 360º-support, preeminent product placement, and vendor-supported applications.

It is easier to market to people like us — techie’s who get it.  Far harder is targeting the majority market that wants 360º-support, preeminent product placement, and vendor-supported applications.

For each of the product adoption segments that you believe you have a product for, list those attributes that you believe they have (or better yet, that your research clarifies them as having).  Weigh each of these attributes as to their importance to the end-user, your strategic partner in the manufacturing of the final consumer product, and in your business model.  This weighted score of attributes is a critical component in a business model that ensures end-user needs are met within the structure of the channel.

BACK TO THE CHANNEL – SUPPORTING THE CONSUMER PRODUCT STRATEGIC PARTNER

Developing a marketing partnership with the consumer product manufacturer can assist in the strategic placement of ingredient products into the hands of the end-user.  Key components  in a successful embedded-technology partnership will be the:

•             expansion of product services,

•             development of systems that the end-users desire,

•             and channel-structure that enables strategic sharing of advertising costs. 

Targeting the consumer product manufacturers price sensitivity with shared advertising and service schemes while remaining diligent on marketing services that are desirable to the end-user will ensure a successful partnership — even without ingredient branding.

Aptina has numerous products in different positions on the technology adoption curve (see below) that could benefit from further segmentation and individual strategic positioning development to better capture market and partner with consumer product manufacturers.  System-On-Chip technology offers much of what the end-user desires in ‘instantaneous darkroom’ and RAW image processing but requires strong partnering with camera manufacturers to enable longer R&D cycles of learning & more complex user interface.

Aptina is well-positioned to take advantage of an increase technical sophistication in camera products by diligently developing end-user segmentation and by partnering in the channel to develop whole-product strategies.

About the Authors

Justin Harnish is Marketing Consultant specializing in semiconductor and solar products where he has spent ten years as an engineer and marketer.

Stratus Launch Marketing is a leading international launch marketing firm that focuses on bringing new technologies to the global marketplace.  Their clients include new product groups in Fortune 500 companies and hundreds of new technology startups.

By James Longwell and Greg Mower View in PDF Format
In virtually every industry other than technol­ogy, the marketing function drives product development. A detergent company will spend several months of research and testing to de­termine a new scent to put in its products. By the time it’s launched, the sales and marketing teams will have a very precise financial pro­forma and business model for exactly how this innovation will affect share. In the technology world, a company will spend years and mil­lions of dollars (even hundreds of millions) in R&D and product development only to throw the new product “over the fence” to sales and marketing who are then tasked to find the cus­tomers.

Technologists, more often than not, create their products first and determine which markets to pursue later.

For nearly 20 years, we’ve been working with technology innovators-from start-up to global tech leaders. And although you could not find a more diverse group relative to products, re­sources, experience, size and vision, there is one striking similarity. In fact, this phenom­enon is so idiosyncratic to technology inno­vators that it has created a unique model for how these products and services are brought to market. This common denominator is that technologists, more often than not, create their products first and determine which markets to pursue later.

To understand why this happens you have to consider how innovators think. These are often brilliant inventors, scientists, engineers who conjure from whole cloth brilliant new ideas. When we first meet with a new product or launch team, our first question is, “who is this for?” And the answer is almost always an emphatic, “everyone who needs it!” That’s be­cause, in the mind of the innovator, the better mousetrap will (of course) cause the masses to beat a path to his door. In most cases, tech­nologists come from the world of science or engineering, so the tendency is to assume the following: “If I build the perfect bridge using all my knowledge of science, physics, engineer­ing, materials and construction, people will drive over it.”

BUT WHAT IF YOU BUILD A BRIDGE IN THE DESERT?

The dynamics of consumer behavior can tor­pedo even the best new ideas, regardless of how perfect or better they are than the sta­tus quo. If you can’t see the bridge, get to it or worse yet, not even have knowledge that it exists -you’ll never be able to drive to the other side. That is why there has to be a ro­bust, focused effort to determine market seg­mentation and positioning strategy -either as a function of product development or (after the fact as in most cases) as the foundation of the launch plan. This is how you cut and pave your road to the bridge and, hopefully, to success.

LAUNCH MYTHS VERSUS MARKET REALITIES

There are several “comforting mythologies” that lull innovators into thinking they are more prepared than they actually are to go to mar­ket. So, in order to enable success you have to first replace prevailing mythology with market reality.

MYTH 1: TECHNOLOGY SUPERIORITY EQUALS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Forget it. Tech superiority doesn’t even get you in the door. People buy solutions that solve human problems or enhance our lives. And other than the very thin slice of the mar­ket called “early adopters”, most consum­ers couldn’t care less about the underlying technology. In fact, it’s extremely rare that a company that produces a “technologically superior” product is also the category market leader. Market share leaders usually focus on developing and managing consumer mind­share rather than attempting technological leap-frog with their competitors. Companies that chase and promote superior technology as their principal value proposition will inevita­bly end up a third or fourth-tier market player. That’s if they ever see the light of day at all.

MYTH 2: GREAT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS KNOW WHAT TO BUILD

In the absence of any real market direction, great developers focus on building the “cool things” which they believe will, in fact, change the world. They’ll assume what customers want based on their own experience, which is usually not even close to market reality. In fact, the more unfocused the market segmen­tation strategy, the more likely the develop­ment team will fall into “feature creep” trying to engineer for every possible customer and need. Developers and engineers are awesome natural problem solvers. So, give them clear and unambiguous market problems to solve.

MYTH 3 : WE ALREADY KNOW WHO OUR CUSTOMERS ARE

Innovators tend to define their market as small, medium and large -or “everyone who needs my product.” This is not the state of the art in market segmentation. First, it’s so vague as to be useless. One company will cat­egorize small as under 50 employees, another will call it under 500. There is also no way to accurately determine the needs, wants and desires of customers in a poorly defined mar­ket model. Which means you can’t effectively position against competitors and alternatives, create messaging platforms that resonate with customers, determine proper distribution channels or confidently develop marketing programs that will move the needle.

When you take all these pitfalls and potential launch disasters as a whole, it’s not surpris­ing that so many new product innovations fail. However, the first line of defense can also be the key to avoiding a majority of potential threats: clear and focused market segmenta­tion and positioning strategy.

MARKET SEGMENTATION CREATES MARKET DIRECTION AND LAUNCHES SUCCESS

A focused segmentation strategy should be the primary “tent pole” of your go-to-market plan. That’s why it’s tragic that this one area is so often overlooked by innovators and technologists. Diligence in this area will make every effort more streamlined and effective ­from the product development phase, to re­cruitment and enablement of partners, to the promotional messaging on a web site, a sales presentation, or on-shelf in a store. It will also provide three key benefits that should be at the top of your list of operational objectives ­saving money, decreasing time to market and accelerating time to mature volume (in other words, making more money as quickly as possible). Of course, this is easier said than done. But, on the other hand, it doesn’t have to be a total mystery.

A true market segment is a group of customers, sharing common desires, needs and buying patterns, who are self referencing.

The first step is to give up the notion that everyone who needs your product is your customer. Even the largest companies in the world can’t make that claim. A true market segment is a group of customers, sharing common desires, needs and buying patterns, who are self referencing. In other words, they share common interests and they talk to each other, which means you can easily and effec­tively identify and communicate with them. These can be vertical segments by industry, horizontal segments across functional areas, demographic/psychographic/behavioral con­sumer segments -the key is to define where the low hanging fruit is (i.e. the easily achiev­able goals) and then place your large bets in this area.

Segmentation research is the primary tool for gaining this insight, but there are ways that you can focus this effort as well in order to save time and money.  Create an Attribute and Weighting Model. This is a mostly intuitive, but highly effective, way to determine a short list of market segments before you conduct formal research. It brings focus and clarity to the natural tendency to want to be all things to all people.

MARKET SEGMENTATION 101

Start with a list of potential customer seg­ments (at this point it’s OK to list every seg­ment you can imagine). Then list the key at­tributes that you want in a potential customer (such as “easy to identify”, “highly self refer­encing”, “identifiable sales cycles” , “likely to invest in our product category” , etc.) . Then weigh the attributes (based on how important they are to your success) and cross reference them to the segments. You’ll be amazed at how quickly 75% of the candidates will sud­denly become less attractive.

Now you have a manageable short list of customer segments that you can research in more depth. Don’t be surprised if this exer­cise turn s you 180 degrees from the original go-to-market assumptions. It’s the difference between throwing a bunch of ping pong balls at a wall versus slicing through it with the point of a spear.

PRODUCT POSITIONING HAPPENS

Determining the right segment greatly simpli­fies the positioning strategy. Unfortunately, this is another area where innovators drop the ball. The looming threat is that, if you don’t take control, you will be “positioned” by your com­petitors, alternative options, the press. Face it -positioning happens whether you like it or not. However, if you’ve done the work to define the target segment and your key benefits and value propositions, this will be a (relatively) easy task. Analysis of the target market segment landscape will reveal where competitors and alternatives are already positioned. With strong companies, this position will be a fortress that you should avoid. If a company is already occupying the “low price” position, you need to find another avenue to penetrate the market.

Analysis of the target market segment landscape will reveal where competitors and alternatives are already positioned.

Once you’ve determined where you should be positioned, write a “Positioning Statement.” This is the easiest way to determine if you’ve targeted the right customer, provided the right benefits and are clearly differentiated from the compe­tition. The key test is if it’s defendable. We’ve seen positioning statements so vague you could replace “micro chip” with “potato chip”. Craft the statement using these components:

• Who’s it for (target)?

• What is the product?

• What are its key value propositions?

• What is the primary benefit to the customer (remember it’s not the technology)?

• How is it differentiated from the competition (or alternatives)?

In order for this to pass the test of “defendabil­ity.” each of these areas must be addressed as narrowly and specifically as possible. Gen­eralizations will obstruct your ability to defend the position. And, if you can’t be specific or the answers are “me too” to the competition, then you aren’t positioned correctly. Don’t worry, it usually takes several iterations before the true, defendable position is discovered. Not completing this step will result in a frus­trating struggle with what to say at every point in the launch process. However, if this is done right, all downstream communication (with all constituents) can focus on how to reach the audience and how to deliver the message -not on what to say. This will, again, save time and precious resources and put you on the road to being one of the rare innovation success sto­ries rather than a bridge in the desert.

James Longwell & Greg Mower are the Founding Partners of Stratus Launch Marketing (www.stratusmarketing.com) a leading international launch marketing firm that focuses on bringing new technologies into the global marketplace. Their clients include new product groups within the Fortune 500 and hundreds of new technology startups.